Original Article
Comparison of Candida tropicalis and Recombinant Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) Expressed Enzyme Production for Bioconversion of Lignocellulosic Materials
Year: 2019 | Month: December | Volume 7 | Issue 2
1.Agustriyanto, R., Fatmawati, A. and Liasari, Y. 2012. Study of enzymatic hydrolysis of dilute acid pretreated coconut husk. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering and Catalysis, 7(2): 137–141.
View at Google Scholar2.Bollag, D.M. and Edelstein, S.J. 1991. Protein methods. Isbn 0471568716. Retrieved from http://www. getcited.org/pub/102871194.
View at Google Scholar3.Dasgupta, D., Bandhu, S., Adhikari, D.K. and Ghosh, D. 2017. Challenges and prospects of xylitol production with whole cell bio-catalysis : A review. Microbiological Research, 197: 9–21.
View at Google Scholar4.Deb, P., Talukdar, S.A., Sarker, P.K. and Sayem, S.M.A. 2013. Production and partial characterization of extracellular amylase enzyme from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens P-001, (August 2015).
View at Google Scholar5.Enzim, K.K. and Ekstrak, H. 2013. Effects of Enzyme Concentration, Temperature, pH and Time on the Degree of Hydrolysis of Protein Extract from Viscera of Tuna (Euthynnus affinis) by Using Alcalase, 42(3): 279–287.
View at Google Scholar6.Foo, Y.H. 2019. Metabolic Engineering of lignocellulosic nzymes into a single construct for recombinant in situ bioconversion.
View at Google Scholar7.Gao, X., Yan, X. and Kang, Z. 2015. Purification, characterization, and heterologous expression of an antifungal protein from the endophytic Bacillus subtilis strain Em7 and its activity against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, 1238189 (February 2016).
View at Google Scholar9.Janusz, G., Pawlik, A., Sulej, J., Swiderska-burek, U., Jarosz-wilkoÅ‚azka, A. and Paszczy, A. 2017. Lignin degradation : microorganisms, enzymes involved, genomes analysis and evolution, (October), pp. 941–962.
View at Google Scholar10.Joshi, H. and Jain, V. 2017. Novel method to rapidly and efficiently lyse Escherichia coli for the isolation of recombinant protein. Analytical Biochemistry, 528: 1–6.
View at Google Scholar11.Kumari, M. 2013. Production of lignocellulose ethanol from Ipomoea carnes by bacterial cellulase of cow and deer dung. Life Science National Institute of Technology Rourkela, (411).
View at Google Scholar12.Li, Y., Gou, Z., Zhang, Y., Xia, Z., Tang, Y. and Kida, K. 2017. Biotechnology and Industrial Microbiology Inhibitor tolerance of a recombinant flocculating industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain during glucose and xylose co-fermentation. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 48(4): 791–800.
View at Google Scholar13.Liu, L., Yang, H., Shin, H., Chen, R.R., Li, J., Du, G. and Chen, J. 2013. How to achieve high-level expression of microbial enzymes Strategies and perspectives. Landes Bioscience. Do not distribute, 4(4): 212–223.
View at Google Scholar14.McKelvey, S.M. and Murphy, R.A. 2011. Biotechnological Use of Fungal Enzymes. Fungi: Biology and Applications.
View at Google Scholar15.Menon, V., Prakash, G. and Rao, M. 2013. Value added products from hemicellulose : Biotechnological perspective Keywords.
View at Google Scholar16.Muley, P.D. and Boldor, D. 2017. Advances in Biomass Pretreatment and Cellulosic Bioethanol Production Using Microwave Heating, (June), 27–30.
View at Google Scholar17.Nobre, T. and Aanen, D.K. 2012. Fungi culture or termite husbandry? the ruminant hypothesis. Insects, 3(1): 307–323.
View at Google Scholar18.Pathak, S. and Chaudhary, H.S. 2013. Perspective of microbial species used in lignocelluloses bioconversion. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, 4(2).
View at Google Scholar19.Ramanan, R.N., Ling, T.C. and Ariff, A.B. 2008. The performance of a glass bead shaking technique for the disruption of Escherichia coli cells. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 13(5): 613–623.
View at Google Scholar20.Rosa Estela Quiroz-Castañeda and Jorge Luis Folch-Mallol. 2013. Hydrolysis of Biomass Mediated by Cellulases for the Production of Sugars, Sustainable Degradation of Lignocellulosic Biomass - Techniques, Applications and Commercialization, Dr. Anuj Chandel (Ed.).
View at Google Scholar21.Rosano, G.L. 2014. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: Advances and challenges Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli : advances and challenges, (July).
View at Google Scholar22.Sangaran, P. 2014. Degradation of Lignocellulose from Coconut Husk by Bacteria Isolated from Cow Dung and Termite Gut. MSU Bachelors Thesis.
View at Google Scholar23.Sarker, P.K., Talukdar, S.A., Deb, P. and Sayem, S.M.A. 2013. Optimization and partial characterization of culture conditions for the production of alkaline protease from Bacillus licheniformis P003, (October).
View at Google Scholar24.Singh, R., Kumar, M., Mittal, A. and Kumar, P. 2016. Microbial enzymes : industrial progress in 21st century. 3 Biotech, 6(2): 1–15.
View at Google Scholar25.Smith, P.K. et al. 1985. “Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid”. Anal. Biochem., 150(1): 76–85.
View at Google Scholar26.Sweeney, M.D. and Xu, F. 2012. Biomass Converting Enzymes as Industrial Biocatalysts for Fuels and Chemicals: Recent Developments. Catalysts, 2(2): 244–263.
View at Google Scholar28.Tamayo, C., Guerrero-prieto, V., Guigon-lopez, C., Vargas-albores, F., Acosta-muniz, C. and Ojedabarrios, D. 2016. Research & Reviews : Journal of Botanical Sciences Oleophila for the Biocontrol of Penicillium expansum, 5(1): 38–45.
View at Google Scholar29.Xie, C., Yan, L., Gong, W., Zhu, Z., Tan, S. and Chen, D. 2016. Effects of Different Substrates on Lignocellulosic Enzyme Expression, Enzyme Activity and Substrate Utilization (Pleurotus eryngii), 410205, 1479–1494.
View at Google Scholar